Wednesday, May 18, 2016

On Viridiana

On Viridiana
Follow this link to read Michael Wood´s article for the Criterion´s Collection, a review of Viridiana that includes interesting insights into the context and intent of the film. 
https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/423-viridiana-the-human-comedy

There are many controversies surrounding Buñuel´s Viridiana (1961), among others, whether it is really a Spanish film, since the director had not returned to his native country since 1926. Some Spanish critics say that, because his films were forbidden in Spain under Franco, he might not even have influenced any of the emerging directors of the 1960s and 70s. But that is easily refuted. In an interview regarding his return to Spain in 1960 in order to prepare the filming of Viridiana, Buñuel mentions meeting with Bardem (we know him, the director of Death of a cyclist), Carlos Saura (we will meet him soon), and others to discuss the state of cinema in the country, and after the scandal created by Viridiana the latter two directors even joined forces to  create a production company that tried to distribute Buñuel´s films in Spain --they almost went broke, because after the Viridianda fiasco Franco´s government forbade the showing of films by Buñuel. 
The beggars´supper
Michael Wood argues, as we mentioned in class, that Buñuel   insisted his films were not meant as political critiques, but rather as explorations of the human psyche. His explanation fits his own Freudian beliefs, developed from the influences of surrealism. But through psychoanalytical theory we could argue that Buñuel´s "subconscious" also deals with the social, political, and cultural concerns he confronts in his everyday life, and therefore will be reflected in his plots and characters. One example is the reference Jorge makes to the land he has inherited from his father, which "has not been tilled for 20 years" (the same time it had passed since the end of the Spanish Civil War).

On the other hand, perhaps because he had not lived in Spain for such a long time he might have been able to perceive traits of the Spanish character not noticeable to the Spaniards themselves.  That geographical distance might have made him more sensitive to  more extreme --more stereotyped?-- expressions of the national character: we discussed in class the role of the "esperpento", the grotesque figures explored in the paintings of Goya, a tradition of cartoonish representation that dates back to pre-Christian times in the Iberian Peninsula. That tradition has informed Spanish artwork through the 20th and 21st century, (we will see how some of these traits apply to the work of other directors', including many of Almodóvar´s characters), also including the work of a good friend of Buñuel´s, the surrealist painter Salvador Dalí, who admired and imitated those distorted figures because they  represented a society corrupted by vice, and perhaps spoke more loudly to him as to what it is to be Spanish, than it did to the Spaniards.



Compare Spanish Painter Francisco de Goya's "esperpento" with Buñuel´s paupers
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRzX7N2ZoeyTMFFTBWn4TkQ9cN-PkJyA_tLY9H8Jbf0h2AnH7NhPerhaps because he did not live in Spain, Buñuel had the opportunity to explore from a different perspective the relationship between the psychoanalytical theories that sprouted Surrealism and the Volkgeist of the Spanish, especially when it comes to the influence of myth and religion.

One of the aspects that caught my attention in Wood´s article is his view that Buñuel has created a universal tale, and that his critique is not specific to the Spanish circumstances, but "a reminder that pleasure and curiosity and appetite can always turn to destruction and violence. This is not an argument against pleasure and curiosity and appetite, or an appeal for law and order. It is a picture of a society that doesn’t understand its own needs." This, of course, could be a reference to Franco´s Spain (or a broader critique of the Spanish character), but Wood´s consideration that "Buñuel’s skepticism and his sense of outrage concern the smallness of our vision of progress, our narrow attempts to achieve it through rational or moralistic planning, and our anxious disregard of the disruptive forces without which no society would be human" lends it that broader, universal significance (and can be applied, I think, to a reading of Almodóvar´s Talk to Her).

 To support that universalizing ideal, we can point at Buñuel´s appropriation of some easily identifiable elements the Western cultural tradition. The reference to Goya applies here, since he is a Spanish artist but also considered a universal one; another Western referent is the music: from the opening we hear the notes of the Messiah, by German composer George Friederic Handel, one of the most famous pieces of classical choral music, echoes through Don Jaime´s estate. There is even a reference to the  Western literary canon that adds to the symbolic meaning of the story: In the first part of the film, as Viridiana is exiting the barn, her hair covered with a scarf, her shoulders wrapped in a woolen cape, she runs into her uncle Jaime. Viridiana comments on how early he is up: "The longer to see you", is his reply, a clear allusion to Little Red Ridinghood. The reference to Leonardo Da Vinci´s "Last Supper" is also part of this inscription of the story into the Western tradition, and of the history of religious imagery. Jorge´s "freethinking" attitude, including his attitude towards marriage, charity, etc. can also be read as a critique of Spain in the context of European humanistic values versus the Catholic tradition promoted as key to the Spanish heritage by the Franco regime.

But, intentionally or not, the journey of Viridiana from the convent to the world of her family´s country home is full of referents to the conflicts between tradition and modernity that we have argued are at the heart of the tensions that both the state and the artists are trying to resolve in Spain in the 1960s.


27 comments:

  1. Throughout Viridiana, Luis Bunuel comments on the role of the church within society. In doing this, he reveals what he believes is wrong with the church and how it functions within society. One criticism he makes is on church’s charity. At one point in the film, the Mother from the convent comes to visit after Viridiana’s uncle dies. During this time, Viridiana confesses that she feels guilty for her Uncle’s suicide. This I believe is her driving force for helping the papers. She really is just using them as atonement for her guilt. Although, I do believe that she does somewhat care about them, I think that either consciously or subconsciously she is using them as a tool to make herself feel better. This really shows the critique of the church. Viridiana, as a symbol, represents the church. So, in seeing that, Viridiana’s downfall in only doing charity for herself, reflects upon the church as well. Bunuel is exposing the judgement on the church, that they organize charitable events and deed for selfish reasons. This is an idea fundamental to church’s, charity for selflessness, so seeing Viridiana do charity for what seems like selfish reasons speaks volumes. This is because it mirrors onto the institution of the church as a whole. Furthering Bunuel’s criticism on the church is the scene in which the paupers recreate the scene in Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper. This scene is very ironic. In essence, the paupers are mocking the painting and, symbolically, the foundations of the church too. In this, they are also turning their back on the church lady who is helping them, Viridiana, because she represents the church as well. This points to the idea of charity not accomplishing anything. It doesn’t help people turn their lives around to Catholicism, which tends to be the goal of charity a lot. In this situation, it shows hows people don’t change after charity and how it doesn’t really help. Overall, Bunuel criticizes the church and its role with charity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As mentioned in class today, as well as in the documentary, Luis Buñuel’s films are not intended to be political or religious critiques, but rather an exploration of the human psyche that incorporates various, unique elements that Buñuel feels compelled to include. That being said, I can certainly see how his film Viridiana is often interpreted as a harsh criticism of both the political and social position of Spain during Franco’s regime, as well as of the Catholic Church as a whole. One of the reasons the film is often interpreted this way by viewers is simply due to the powerful and surprising religious imagery that is incorporated throughout its entirety, such as the burning crown of thorns shown towards the end of the movie. Frankly, based off of this imagery alone, it is very surprising that this film was allowed to be released at all in 1961. During this time, and for all of Franco’s regime (1939-1975), the Catholic Church was entrusted with more power and privileges than it had had since the 18th century. When first finishing the film, I automatically felt as though it was a criticism of the church; however, after reflecting, I started to view the film as a representation of mankind’s sinful and evil nature, as well as the idea that even the Catholic Church often renders powerless in changing this corruption. Throughout the entirety of the film, Buñuel seems to be demonstrating the idea that human sin and wickedness is so innate, powerful, and ingrained within some individuals that even the charity, good works, and power of the church are absolutely incapable of creating any change within their hearts. The most obvious way in which this idea is depicted is through Viridiana’s failed attempt to help the poor and homeless. She provides them with absolutely everything that they need to be successful: food, shelter, warmth, kindness, religious education, devotional time, and love. Despite the kind, charitable, and religious acts of Viridiana, her attempt to help these individuals ultimately fails horrendously. When being left alone for the first time, all of the paupers sneak into the home, have a dinner, and display countless sinful behaviors such as drunkenness, lust, and gluttony in a twisted reenactment of “The Last Supper.” By showing this, I believe that Buñuel is not actually criticizing the church, but rather simply demonstrating the concept that the church and its people are ultimately not powerful enough to completely alter the innate elements of human nature.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While demonstrating this idea, Buñuel simultaneously presents the stark contrast between modern and traditional values and beliefs through his use of music, characters, and plot development within the film. To start, there is a massive contrast between the classical, traditional music played throughout the entire movie, and the rock ’n’ roll song that is played at the very end. Additionally, Buñuel demonstrates these differences through the characters of Viridiana and Jorge. Viridiana embodies the traditional values and beliefs that were accepted and welcomed in Franco’s regime; she is quiet, respectful, and devoutly Catholic. Jorge, on the other hand, represents a much more modern character who does not seem to be associated with religion at all, and who chooses to break free from traditional rules. With his obvious depiction of the contrast between the modern and the traditional, I believe that whether consciously or not, Buñuel hints toward the idea that in order for Spain to undergo a transition and break free from the suffering and complications of Franco’s regime, it needed to adopt more modern values and beliefs. In my eyes, this idea is displayed through the character and representation of Jorge. He is the only character within the film who seems to produce any form of change or progress. Viridiana completely fails in all of her endeavors despite her devout religious beliefs and values; however, Jorge succeeds in his goals. The best example of this is when Jorge describes that the land has been dead and neglected for 20 years, which would mean since the end of the Spanish Civil War, and the start of Franco’s regime. After seeing the condition of the land, it is this modernized character who ends up creating change and producing new growth and revitalization.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nosotros necesitamos ser egoístas para tener orden. Este es el condición humano. Y sin una manera en que los deseos humanos son capaces de expresarse, el caos es inevitable. En la pelicula "Viridiana," director Luis Buñuel explora este necesidad y cómo la Iglesia Católica reprimía la gente de España. Buñuel nos muestra que hay muchos problemas cuando personas son forzadas seguir reglas estrictas en un sistema religioso, a pesar de que parecen ser para el bien de la población.

    Este historia no está diseñado para la crítica de un sistema political específico, sino Buñuel está tratando comunicarnos un idea de represión emocional dentro de la vida en general y dentro de la iglesia (probablemente solo porque la iglesia tenía un impacto grande de la situación de la gente de España). Viridiana es una mujer quien casi se hizo una monja. Siempre, ella trata hacer la cosa correcta y moral, pero es obvio que hay una lucha entre de sus deseos actuales y su obligación moral. Debido a sus creencias profundas en las reglas de la Iglesia Catolica, ella abre su casa a muchos mendigos del pueblo, y intenta enseñarles para ser católicos buenos. Pero al reprimir esta clase inferior de la sociedad, ella no los ayuda en absoluto. De hecho, cuando finalmente se dan un momento solos, su verdadera naturaleza reaparece y ellos destruyen y violan y roban.

    El hombre que parece ser el más estable a través de la pelicula es el primo de Viridiana, Jorge. Es claro que Jorge no es un hombre religioso. En muchos sentidos, él es egoísta y pervertidos. Pero hay un cierto grado de orden en su vida; y al final, él es representado como un héroe. Constantemente, Luis Buñuel está intentando hacer el punto que el problema viene cuando nos permitimos ser reprimidos - por la iglesia o de otras maneras. En su película, él efectivamente trae en la cultura española y la religión para ayudarle a hacer su punto más universal.

    Scott Weaver

    ReplyDelete
  5. Viridiana Review
    --- Xiaoke Qi
    Bunuel was famous for his surrealism, like cutting eyeballs or dragging a piano, in the early stage movies, but he returned to logic and reality in Viridiana. Bunuel carefully implied the craziness into a “normal” story that could be easily understood by the audience. Although Bunuel was accused of blaspheming the catholic church, I believe that he was simply interpreting his understanding of religion. Bunuel pointed out the imbalance between the idealism of church and the reality through the transition of Viridiana. Viridiana left the convent to visit her dying uncle, yet she never returned back due to the death of her uncle. However, she never gave up her faith after experiencing her uncle’s near-rape action or the guilty of her uncle’s death. In fact, she applied what she learned in the convent to the beggars by starting the charity. As the representative of idealism, Viridiana tried her best to protect the poor and provide them with spiritual support. However, the principles from the convent did not work out in the real society. Without an overall increase of social cognitive level, the religious power cannot benefit the public and the individual’s charity is still in vain. Bunuel took an ironical scene in which the poor took over Viridiana’s house and posted the most famous “Final dinner” posture. I do not take it as a blasphemed but a symbol of breaking the idealism of the catholic church. Jorge, the representative of rationality and realism, criticized Viridiana’s behaviors for saving only a small group of those who needed help. Yet, he also demonstrated mercy through helping the dog tied under the cart. There were some connections between Viridiana and Jorge for their limited charity to the society, and this connection could suggest the secretly colluded between the bourgeoisie and the church. Thus, I believe Bunuel was not against the catholic religion but the corrupt clericalism.
    Bunuel used a lot of metaphor when showing the oppression of clericalism, as well as the pressure under authoritarianism. As the most barren country under the control of Franco, Bunuel described the broad waste land and hoped that the approach of capitalism (the character of Jorge) could fix and reorganize the land (country). Besides the politics metaphor, Bunuel also adopted crossover clips to describe the messy construction scenes and the serious prayer scenes. It not only destroyed the atmosphere of devout prayer but also satirized people’s resistance to the oppression of church’s doctrine. The movie mentioned the knife with a cross decoration twice. Bunuel stated straight forward through the mouth of Jorge that “it was a bright idea” to hide destruction and harm behind the mercy of religion. I especially love two scenes towards the end of the movie. The first one was the carnival of the beggars. It was like a passionate revolution of those who have been oppressed for years. When they form the famous scene of “final dinner”, the most obscene repulsive blind took over the role of Jesus. What an irony to the Catholic church. Bunuel explained himself in his autobiographical film that he only represented his film the way he understood religion. It is true, and he did express his opposition to the hypocrite and bound of the catholic church, not the religion itself. Viridiana presented the most critical problem in the Spain society back in the 1960s where the suppression domination was still in effective under Franco, and the catholic church’s efforts to change the world was useless like Viridiana’s behaviors. The idealism would fail in the Spain society because it did not fit the reality.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Viridiana juxtaposed surrealism and realism in that characters played out allegorical themes living in Bunuel’s subconscious but these were laid this atop a story that was easily believable, a young girl that begrudgingly visits her aging uncle to pay him respect. Interlaced within the story are suggestive undertones that challenge the Franco regime as well as the Catholic church that, interestingly enough, went unnoticed (or at least unattended to) until after the film’s release.
    Unfortunately, we aren’t given much background on Viridiana’s life before the convent, only that she had no surviving family members other than the distant, generous uncle. For whatever reason Bunuel chose to leave this part of the story to the imagination of his audience. Even without this information, I think we are able to understand her charitable nature as the story develops. When she first arrived at her uncle’s estate, she bluntly tells him that she feels no affection for him which struck me as a bit too honest, perhaps a result of her strict spiritual discipline in regards to honesty? However, the next day the sullen girl is replaced with a bubbly maiden gathering milk and eggs to make her uncle a cake. The contradiction might suggest that Bunuel saw humanity as an exercise in constant contradiction. As someone pointed out in class, we yearn to be good, to do good and yet we are failed humans, sinners.
    Our class discussion made me think deeper about the scene in which the dog was released from the cart. There are a number of assumptions one could make about what Bunuel was insinuating. As today’s reading suggests, Bunuel could have been taking a jab at Catholicism, the Franco regime, or both, “like the scene with the dogs tied to a moving cart by a rope that will strangle them if they stop trotting”. Stay in line, or else. The second part of this scene that we didn’t discuss in class was the second dog that was shown tied to a cart going the other direction. I feel this was a clear message that as hard as we might try, we can’t save everyone. The article suggests the same, “No blasphemy, then, but a merciless look at a world that cannot be saved”. This, of course, can apply to Viridiana’s attempt to create a shelter for the random people she collects and takes into her home. Some in class mentioned she collected them as pets, to ease her guilty conscience and others suggested it was just her kind nature, perhaps she was acting in a way that felt natural to her as her deeply held beliefs had taught her to care for the poor, widowed, and orphaned.
    The film’s ending left me questioning who Viridiana had become and what she truly wanted. So many conclusions could be drawn from the way the last scene played out but I believe Viridiana, feeling defeated by the beggars abuse of her generosity, abandons her chaste and virtuous persona (the way she admired her beauty in the proceeding scene supports this) and gives in to her cousin’s flirtation and her own sinful nature.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Adylene Silva
    En Luis Buñuel´s Viridiana , el director critica más notablemente la psique humana. El movimiento inevitable hacia lo moderno y nuevo es relevante en la película. Personaje principal Viridiana podría decirse que ha puesto su entera fe en su religión. Después de no volver al convento de monjas, ella toma un grupo de inadaptados sin hogar a la casa de su tío con la esperanza de aliviar su culpa y su propósito en el mundo. Entre toda la película, Viridiana es notablemente piadosa. Ella es un personaje que todo el mundo clasifica ya sea como un ángel o muy ingenuo, el cambio que le sucede al final es muy interesante. Lo que siento que Buñuel estaba tratando de expresar es las salidas mentales que la gente comenzó a explorar después que la religión les había fallado. Después de su experiencia de que casi la violan, la siguiente escena de Viridiana es su adorno para ir a ver a Jorge en lo que parece ser noche, y su liberación de la religión cuando se da cuenta que en ser ella piadosa no le atraído nada muy bueno. Jorge también es una representación de la modernización de los pueblos de España. Era siempre un país profundamente religioso, el espectador puede ver a Jorge como la nueva era de los modernos. Él trae agricultura a la casa de su padre cuando ha sido ausente debido a la Guerra Civil Española años antes. También tiene relaciones muy anti-convencionales con las mujeres. Incluso dice en la película que no necesita estar casado con una mujer para dormir con ella, muy progresista. De hecho, es atraída por todas las mujeres en la película, su novia, su criada y Viridiana. Él es un ejemplo de una nueva era en España, con sus ideas progresistas y la nueva tecnología que trae a la casa. Parece que el valora lo progresivo, donde Viridiana valora la tradición y las convenciones del pasado. Al final, ella alivia a sí misma de su modo piadoso y se une a Jorge y a la criada en la escena final, un símbolo de cambio con música americana jugando en el fondo y un toque de sexualidad por venir que no aclaran para el espectador.

    ReplyDelete
  8. After learning a bit about Bunuel and then watching the film Viridiana one instantly wants to analyze different scenes through a social/political lens. Despite Bunuel’s own insistence that his process is not influenced by religion or politics it is hard to ignore the symbolism throughout the film. One example would be the golden crucifix doubling as a folding knife. Don Jorge’s reaction is incredulous, “What an idea!” he exclaims, as oblivious to the symbolism as Bunuel feigns to be. The idea the cross/knife leaves the viewer with is this; Perhaps religion is a double-edged sword, both good and bad simultaneously. A more accurate assessment based on the content of this film could be; what seems to be conventionally moral and pious behavior can have unintended and unforeseen consequences despite intentions. One would think that Viridiana’s act of helping the beggars would be good, that the beggars would appreciate her kindness and become whole again. However, Viridiana’s kindness is taken for granted and the situation becomes terrible for her. The photograph scene can be easily identified as a mockery of The Last Supper, perhaps juxtaposing the sacrament that was sullied by Judas with the beggar’s betrayal of Viridiana. The scene where Jorge rescues the dog leads to several scenes that illuminate some interesting dialogue and visuals that could be interpreted as religious/social commentary. When he stops the man to buy the dog, Jorge asks him why he doesn’t let the dog ride in the cart. The man answers “that’s only for people”. The dog is not valued by the man and Jorge takes pity. Before the man tells him “the less you feed him, the better he hunts”. Despite this austere treatment, the dog seems to prefer his old master. Jorge saves the dog but as the scene ends another cart rumbles by with another dog. When Jorge criticizes Viridiana’s outreach he tells her it doesn’t really help, but just before he is guilty of the same naivetés. Perhaps, instead of viewing these scenes as critiques of the church Bunuel is simply trying to define a world that is not worth saving. A world that is too far gone filled with problems and people that can no longer be helped. That would certainly fit his atheistic/anarchist profile. When Bunuel's return to Spain after so many years taken into account, the film seems to be more of an sneering expose than a statement fueled by outrage and protest. Maybe like Wood says, this was Bunuel's gag gift to Franco after all.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Alex Willis

    In the film Viridiana, Luis Bunuel challenges the classical views of religion and social status in Spain while incorporating his own personal style in his filmmaking. During the Franco rule, expression of thoughts and emotions were limited but Bunuel’s views clearly contradict accepted traditional ones.
    In the beginning of the movie the setting has a very traditional feel to it, but as the story progresses the scenes become progressively more modern and resemble a greater sense of anarchy. This is also noticeable in the way that religious ideals evolve. Viridiana begins her journey as a woman in the process of becoming a nun, but a trip to her Uncle’s homestead drastically changes her path. After seemingly losing her virginity the night she was kissed by her uncle she tries to continue acting in a Godly manner by showing humility and kindness. Despite her best efforts to help the poor, her plan falls apart the night she left to see the lawyer. Perhaps this is Bunuel’s strategy to condemn Catholicism by presenting the idea that no matter how much humility is shown by the church, their efforts can still fall short. The evolution of the music from classical to rock and role also makes it evident that Viridiana could have had a change in her morals.
    Another important theme in this film are the roles and behaviors of those in different social classes. Upper class citizens in the film such as Jorge and Don Jaime act like one would suspect a person with a large sum of money to act, while the poor are criticized and humiliated. This is apparent because not only do most of the poor characters have external flaws, they are also portrayed as lazy and irresponsible. Bunuel is supposedly suggesting that the poor should be given a chance to work and redeem themselves but in the end their behaviors will get the best of them. The religious and social analogies presented by the director in this film could be shining a light on some of his personal views atheism and obscureness.
    There were several other of Bunuel’s personal imprints on this film, the most evident being his fascination for women’s legs and feet and his love for animals. When Viridiana was at her Uncle’s house the camera was focused on her feet and the way she walked more so than her appearance overall. His love of animals is also apparent when he buys the dog from the coach driver. He might be trying to convey that animals need to be treated better when the second dog is seen roped to the carriage right after he buys the first.
    One last thing that came to mind was the use of color in the film. Viridiana is seen wearing white, a color of holiness and purity, before her encounter with Don Jaime, but afterwards she wears most black. It should be noted that most of the other characters wear dark colors, which could resemble the Spanish society as being impure as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As Bunuel himself confirms that his films do not necessarily hold religious or political meaning, it is inconsequential to argue his artistic aim with Viridiana. Regardless of present or absent intentions, Viridiana certainly illustrates the constant push-pull of a society that is at the fate of inevitable progress but simultaneously holds resistance to itself as a result of deep tradition.
    In the closing scene, Jorge is jovial as he briefly discusses their circumstance. Jorge says, “my cousin and I will end up shuffling the deck together.” This statement is interesting it can serve to place the two cousins on opposite sides, or as opposing forces. Viridiana is religious, pious, traditional, pure and purified Catholic, questionably the virgin, while her cousin Jorge is all action and momentum, the steel and machinery rising up above the stagnant and virginal farmlands. He resurrects and brings new life to a reluctant past that has nowhere to go but forward.
    Viridiana and Jorge are the yin and yang present in all life. One cannot exist without the other and so they have no choice but to coexist and “shuffle the deck” together. One is not superior to the other; they are merely two halves of the same coin. At the end of the film, Jorge recognizes this as the reality of existence, and he is joyfully resigned to his role. Just as one dog is “saved” from a cart only to quickly be replaced with another, Bunuel demonstrates that we cannot step outside of either one of these life forces or realities. There will always be another dog in need, there will always be resistance to progress, but there will always be progress.
    Bunuel’s film isn’t necessarily a direct political statement, but it is certainly social commentary, even if unintentional. Viridiana is named for the innocent title character, symbolic perhaps in some way to naïve Franco-era Spain. Jorge knows that evolution and progress is unavoidable, and thus he nudges it along. A balance of sorts is achieved in the realization and acceptance of the fact that there is a place and role for tradition and modernity.

    ReplyDelete
  13. We watched a documentary on Don Luis Bunuel and then later watched his film Viridiana. It helped to go into the movie with some background information on the director. For example, we learned that Bunuel does not like authority of any kind and particularly that of the church. This is interesting because he was raised in a very religious family and the documentary even shows a shrine dedicated to Bunuel that is covered in photographs of popes and crosses. After watching his film Viridiana, I am initially struck with the notion that the film is a critique on the Catholic Church and perhaps religion in general. I believe now that the film is touching on a topic much less specific: human nature. In his article, Michael Wood says that Bunuel provides a “merciless look at a world that cannot be saved.” After her uncle’s suicide, Viridiana takes it upon herself to care for a group of disheveled individuals from the fringes of society. Although her piousness is part of her religion and perhaps her personality, her attempts to reform these people are partially due to guilt that she is trying to work through following the suicide. Later, Jorge spots a dog tied to the undercarriage of a cart passing through. Thinking the animal is being mistreated he buys the dog from the owner in an attempt to give it a better environment. The dog seems to be relatively unbothered by his current circumstance and seems a bit lost after being untied from the carriage. A few seconds later, we see another carriage pass by with an almost identical dog attached to it as well. It’s interesting that Jorge can lecture Viridiana about how useless her efforts are when it comes to the people she has taken in yet his rescuing of the dog appears to be just as futile. This reminds me of Franco’s regime in that he comes into a great deal of power and controls the country in a way he fit, thinking he is improving it for the better. Like I said before, I believe this film is more of a social critique on human nature rather than specifically religion. A classmate mentioned that religion seems to act more like a band-aid than a permanent solution to a problem. Perhaps this is also somehow reflective of Franco’s regime during this time.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anticristiano o anticatólico, Luis Buñuel presenta en esta película la religión y muestra una visión pesimista de lo humano como profundamente perverso. En la película se presentan muchas escenas donde Buñuel hace referencia a la iglesia, insinuando sus peores características. Por ejemplo, hay una escena donde Don Jorge esta con un cruz en la mano la cual a su misma vez es una navaja, dando a entender la doble cara de la religión católica en la historia. Otra escena que también hace mucha referencia a la religión es la escena de la cena, haciendo referencia a “la última cena” de Jesucristo, además de ambientar la escena con la canción de “Aleluya”. Esta escena muestra la metáfora donde aquellos que fueron ayudados por Viridiana, ahora la traicionaran, mostrando la escena donde intentan violarla entre dos de los mendigos.
    El tema de la sociedad es presentado con los mendigos, sobre todo en referencia a que los pobres siempre serán pobres y los ricos seguirán siendo ricos. Esto se muestro cuando Don Jorge ha empezado a construir en la casa y en vez de contratar a los mendigos, contrata a un personal diferente, al igual que la escena presentada con el perro amarrado a la carreta, donde se da a entender que a los de abajo se les deberá pagar por su trabaja, lo suficiente para que vuelvan a trabajar y sobrevivir pero no crecer. Al final de la película también se muestra una escena muy importante referente a la sociedad, la escena muestra a Viridiana aceptando a jugar cartas con Don Jorge. Para mí, esta escena muestra la metáfora del progreso industrial, Viridiana representa un país el cual es trabajado a la antigua y Don Jorge representa la maquinaria y la revolución de la industria con su maquinaria y su juego moderno (en esa época) de los naipes.
    Así que puedo concluir que somos ni ángeles ni lo seremos nunca, ese es el papel de Viridiana, una monja que, sonámbula, pasea en ropa interior mostrando sus pies y piernas a un lujurioso tío, que no puede con su alma por las pasiones que Viridiana en el despierta. La monja que intenta ser caritativa con mendigos, pero descubre que en su ausencia éstos sólo saben hacer las peores acciones humanas: el desorden, ser lujuriosos y perversos, la agresión, en una escena de una orgía que provoca la imagen de una "última cena". La piedad cristiana presentada como fetichismo, la lujuria como motor absoluto de toda acción y, para el cine, lo simbólico y lo surrealista. Una obra con muchos detalles que descubrir, algunos muy obvios.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Starting out when Viridiana visits her uncle, I was not seeing anything extreme to catch my eye. However, once Viridiana is vandalized without her consent, her attitude towards life takes a turn. Before visiting her uncle, she planned on taking her vows at the convent to be a nun. After being told she was raped, she does not see herself as her innocent self and decides she cannot go back. I believe this is where the film makes its strongest turn, as Viridiana makes a vow to herself to help others who are poor in a way to tame her blame of her Uncle’s suicide. With Viridiana’s skill sets and humbleness, she tries to teach manners and appropriate behavior to those she took in, but struggles when towards the end of the film is physically attacked by a couple of her residents. It is very apparent to see how innocent and proper Viridiana acted, and I believed she was a strong representation of the Church at the time. When her uncle died and she decided to help the poor and ultimately failed (in my opinion), Buñuel expressed his poor view of religion showing how the greater good does not always win. In addition, I believe Buñuel does a great job expressing the view points of religion versus urges of human nature in the film. Instead of respecting Viridiana wishes and cleaning up after one selves after eating, everyone reverted back to their own nature, hoarded food, and left a huge mess in the dining hall. I believe this is also a strong representation of no matter what one is told to do, in this case how to clean up after one self, one will revert back to their greedy priority self if they do not believe the information they receive, and I think that’s a strong battle Buñuel faced during his time

    ReplyDelete
  16. En Viridiana (1961) el director Luis Buñuel deja muy claro que sus películas, incluyendo esta, no tienen la intención de ser una crítica política. Este aspecto lo deja claro en el reportaje anterior que vimos antes de Viridiana, donde Buñuel explicaba sus ideas y creencias en una forma bastante honesta. Buñuel confiesa que se considera un ateo, a pesar que esta película contiene varios aspectos religiosos, específicamente católicos. El personaje de Viridiana es una joven guapa, quien asiste al convento para convertirse en monja, así que no es ninguna sorpresa que Viridiana es creyente y dedicada a practicar la religión católica. En cierto modo, para mí, esta primera etapa de Viridiana representa a la España sumamente religiosa bajo la dictadura de Franco. Pienso esto porque símbolos religiosos son presentados durante la primera parte de la película, lo cual suele cambiar en la segunda parte, hacia el final. Las trágicas y malas experiencias que vive Viridiana en la casa de su tío mientras lo visita, le hace confirmar aún más sus creencias católicas, por lo cual decide en ofrecerles asilo a varias personas indigentes. Sin embargo, al enfrentarse a otras desagradables experiencias, particularmente durante la cena irresponsable de las personas indigentes, el personaje de Viridiana cambia completamente. Este cambio que experimenta su personaje me parece que es el símbolo de la España moderna y actual. Me refiero a que la sociedad española de hoy no es tan creyente y religiosa como en los tiempos de Franco, y si algunas personas lo son, usualmente ese número consiste en las viejas generaciones. A pesar de que España aún se considera un país católico, no significa que sea creyente o practique la religión. El personaje de Jorge también representa la modernidad de la sociedad en su forma de pensar y de tomar sus decisiones sin depender en la religión o en las leyes católicas. En una escena de la película, Jorge le comenta a Viridiana que él no necesita estar casado por la iglesia para poder estar o vivir con una mujer, sino que es su decisión propia. Así es como Buñuel presenta estos aspectos con la ayuda de los personajes principales para conseguir crear la comparación entre la sociedad de la España antigua y la moderna.
    -Bianca Soto

    ReplyDelete
  17. Where to begin with Viridiana, politics, society, or individual sexuality? Bunuel addresses them all. Considering his announced disaffected politics, which is the only reason I can conceive of that he was invited to make a fascist film, it is surprising that he engages with political ideas so openly.
    Don Jaime, the older gentlemen who reveres his niece to the point that he can’t seem to consummate her rape (on screen) and hangs himself out of guilt, clearly is a representative of the pro-Franco traditional aristocrat. Don Jaime is clearly religious, and the set construction of his house is both austere and baroque, the woodwork and severity of the hard lines in the house remind one of early renaissance Spanish paintings of traditional homes. He tells his niece at one point that he’d proven he was not a coward twenty years ago, which would’ve been the time of the civil war: Presumably, he was on the winning side. Interestingly, Bunuel doesn’t totally villainize him, while he is morally sick, he seems amiable. His adherence to traditional morals instilled by the church, and perhaps his connection between the church and Viridiana’s nun-hood demonstrates his loyalty to traditional Franconian values. Although the director shows us that the sexual guilt associated with those values leds to his death (make note of the appearance of ropes when sexual guilt arises).
    In contrast, his son, a young inheritor of his estate is a mirror of the new generation that inherits Franco’s Spain twenty years later. He is a capitalist, concerned with building and efficiency with the property, he represents progress. Bunuel evidently had no strong feelings regarding fascism, capitalism, or indeed even communism though Viridiana hubris and defeated experiment would seem to read as anti-communist. Jorge is sexually liberated, unlike his father who is bound by the church, but he hasn’t disparaged anyone for their own beliefs. In fact his liberation seems to be the path forward for Viridiana, as the last rope of sexual guilt appears when she makes her decision to join him and the servant for a three-way (card game).

    to be continued... Eli P.

    ReplyDelete
  18. David Lopez
    Viridiana de Luis Buñuel
    En la película Viridiana de Luis Buñuel se encuentra temas religiosas que pretine particularmente a España. Aunque Buñuel declara que sus películas no eran políticas ni religiosas sino sus películas se enfocaban en lo psicólogo de diferentes personajes. Pero, como artista, las experiencias de la niñez y de la juventud particularmente son las experiencias más influyentes. Buñuel creció en España en una familia rica y bien conocida en su pueblo y también creció en una casa muy católica. Entre su película Viridiana Buñuel construye personajes, que uno puede describidlos como caracteres “esperpento” que siguen siendo los pobres que aparecen en la película representan las creencias de Buñuel. Es muy importante anotar sus apariencias porque todos tienen una apariencia como que si están físicamente deformados – como un esperpento del pintor Goya. Los pobres que Viridiana ayuda, les da comida y un techo para que mejor duerman. Durante la película vemos estos pobres que se aprovechan de Viridiana y la escena que mejor demuestra eso es al final de la película, cuando destruyen la casa de Don Jaime. Cuando Viridiana sale para el pueblo con Jorge, la sirviente, y la niña de la sirviente, Viridiana dice que van regresar el próximo día y deja el más “responsable” encargado y tiene que asegurarse que hagan sus propios trabajos; pero en el momento que se va Viridiana dejan todos de trabajar. Viridiana tiene confianza que los pobres son gente decente que no ocupan supervisión, pero ya sabemos que no son gente de buen corazón. Por ejemplo uno está prohibido de entrar la iglesia porque tiene intenciones de contagiar otros con su brazo infectado, metiendo su brazo en el agua bendita. En La noche, los pobres cenaron en la casa de Viridiana y Jorge y ay un momento donde todos están en la mesa y parecen como si están en la última cena, como se los hubiera ver pintado Leonardo Da Vinci. Los pobres no respetan la casa, ellos arruinan la tela de mesa con vino, están borrachos, y hasta están teniendo sexo en el piso detrás de un sofá. Cuando llega Viridiana se van todos menos dos intentan de violarla. Vemos que no tienen respeto ni para la religión aunque Viridiana los pone a practicar el catolicismo. Esta escena demuestra que siguen con sus vicios que, quizás, los puso en la pobreza, mas aparte, no quieren trabajar y no quieren tomar responsabilidades. Luego Viridiana entra al cuarto donde atacaron a Jorge ella piensa que los dos pobres la van a respetar pero intentan a violarla. Viridiana representa una mujer pura con buenas intenciones, pero lo que fue su caída fue su confianza que toda la gente respeta a Dios como ella. Ella, intentando de ayudar estos pobres y darles cariño y dirección con el poder de cristo, pensaba que los podía cambiar. Viridiana representa los cristianos que piensan que pueden cambiar las cosas feas y la mala gente simplemente con Dios. Los pobres que aceptaban su ayuda sin intenciones de cambiar y se aprovechan por comida. La violación podría ser prevenida si Viridiana no hubiera sido tan confiada en los pobres y la película, últimamente, funciona como un crítico a los cristianos convencido que religión es la solución para todos.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Como visto en un documentario en respecto a la vida de Buñuel, el director ayuda un persona a explorar el subconsciente de la mente humana. En “Vidriana”, aunque hay muchos aspectos de los políticos durante una época de cambiar y muy grave, como los pobres y la riqueza, y la tradicional mezcla con el modernismo, mucho de la película tiene un tema de religión, que también es relativo al régimen Franco, en que su administración se centraba mucho en una España muy tradicional. La pelicula hecho por Buñuel es muy satírica y irónica en la manera que el director comenta en la gran influencia del catolicismo de España. Como el cuchillo en el crucifijo, la película satíricamente muestra los temas de la mezcla de tradición y modernidad que España estaba luchando con durante y después del régimen Franco. Se puede entender la demostración de lucha de España con el campo de la propiedad. El campo y su vegetación había dejado de crecer en el inicio de la regla de Franco en la década de 1940, y cuando Vidriana , una figura religiosa y carácter, y Jorge, un hombre de amabilidad y agendas ocultas y el primo de Vidriana, viene a la casa, la nueva generación de modernidad empieza a reparar la tierra. Las formas de vida tradicionales han evolucionado con la nueva generación y una nueva España comienza a crecer.
    La escena más importante es cuando Jorge compra un perro para salvar la vida del perro. El vendedor no es vacilante pero le da aviso a Jorge; “no llevarlo demasiado comida o se olvidará cómo cazar.” Esto es muy importante porque es el otro gran tema de “Vidriana” y representa qué pasará con los pobres y los sin techo. Vidriana proporciona un ambiente cómodo y debido a esto, los pobres toman, por completo, las ventajas de su gracia. Vidriana y Jorge los tratan como perros, y los sin techo empizan a actuar como perros. Buñuel crea un círculo muy animalística de imaginario en su película con el tratamiento de los pobres y los consecuencias.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Viridiana, del genial director, Luis Buñuel, es un filme extraordinario. Es inevitable notar que el largometraje es un espejo de la manera en que Buñuel ve y entiende su mundo. El director declaró decisivamente que él no se identificó con ningún partido político ni con la religión. Buñuel simplemente formó sus propias reglas morales y las siguió consistentemente. En cierta forma, Buñuel era como un reportero porque a través de sus filmes reportaba lo que él vivía y lo que observaba. Por ejemplo, el director ha observado y vivido la transformación de España a un ambiente más moderno y tecnológico. Lo reporta a través del personaje de Viridiana al mostrar cómo, Viridiana, piensa estar satisfecha tras los confines de un convento donde la madre superior le ha dictado como vivir. Al igual que España viviendo bajo la dictadura de Franco. Después, Viridiana, sale del convento para visitar a su tío que vive fuera del convento en un lugar amplio. Es aquí donde Viridiana comienza una transformación de ideas, consciencia y de identidad propia sin tener necesidad de vestiduras de monja. Al igual, España se ha despojado de las ideas de Franco y su dictadura. España sale de los confines del Franquismo.
    Buñuel, por supuesto, tiene que reportar todo lo que ve en su mundo. Parte de ello son las clases sociales y la iglesia católica. Buñuel observa que la clase alta y religiosa está consciente de los pobres e intentan ayudarlos. El error de la clase alta es pensar que tienen que salvar a estas pobres almas a través de la caridad religiosa. El otro error es querer ofrecer caridad religiosa como forma de limpiar y satisfacer sus propias consciencias. El director lo reporta en el personaje de Viridiana cuando ella decide no ser digna de ser monja (por la supuesta violacion del tio) y va en busca de los limosneros del pueblo para salvarlos de su situación. En forma paralela, Jorge, el hijo de Jaime, que viene a vivir en la misma casa con Viridiana, salva a un perro de una vida bajo una carreta. Pero, Jorge critica a Viridiana por intentar salvar al grupo de vagabundos porque siempre abran más (pero también hay más perros). Algo importante que señalar, es que Viridiana colecta a su grupo de vagabundos al igual que “Jesús, el Mesías” colecto a sus discípulos. Todos los discípulos fueron llamados de las calles y todos fueron gente común como San Pedro el pescador. A pesar del “esperpento” de los vagabundos, Viridiana les suplió toda necesidad, incluyendo respeto y dignidad. Pero en un momento de descuido, cuando Jorge, Viridiana y Ramona no están presentes en la casa, los limosneros deciden darle rienda suelta a todo mal impulso; se emborrachan fuera de sentido, toman lo que no es de ellos, maldicen, se insultan, se pelean, y tienen sexo bajo la misma mesa de su cena. Al ser sorprendidos por los dueños de la casa, todos corren sin tomar responsabilidad. Es más, dos hombres de los vagabundos traicionan a Viridiana y uno intenta violarla. Esto es muy representante de la traición de Cristo y como sus discipulos uyen dejandolo solo.
    Buñuel se decía ser ateo, pero talvez en lo más profundo de su ser, creía en un ser supremo. Talvez no en la misma manera que la iglesia católica lo “dicta.” Vinel afirmo “nací ateo, gracias a Dios.” Es posible que Buñuel le había dado su propio significativo al ser ateo. Esta teoría se me hace posible porque, en la cena de los vagabundos, tal vez el mensaje es de que, aun en la clase alta, por más “santos” que aparenten ser, y por más caridad, y por más educados, y por más dominados los deseos carnales, la lujuria es una “emoción” engañosa en el corazón humano y, el deseo sexual es un instinto humano-animal que no se puede enjaular. Es por eso que Viridiana despierta a esa realidad y "entra" en lo moderno sin ser monja religiosa, pero creyendo en Dios.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Viridiana starts this movie as a sister in training whom does not want to touch the outside world. If not for her mother superior’s orders to give respect to her beneficing uncle, she might never have come to know the outside world.
    While visiting her uncle Viridiana was willing to drink milk, but not touch its source: a cow’s teats. She tried to but was unable to make herself. It was an interesting disconnect from her old life on the farm. One that comes up throughout the movie in various ways.
    Viridiana did not know the value of what her uncle provided her with until he started asking favors, such as wearing his dead wife’s wedding dress. As the favors got larger, she eventually refused. After trying to scare/bully her into staying fails, he commits suicide. She ends up blaming herself and decides to stay in that house sheltering the poor.
    This choice is an oddly similar one to where she was before, except roles are reversed. She is no longer part of a convent’s flock; she is now trying to be a shepherdess. In a sense, after realizing what comforts her uncle enabled for her, Viridiana wanted to give these comforts to the suffering poor. She didn’t truly realize the cost of sheltering them, as her cousin was running the estate after the uncle’s death, but she does realize how fortunate she was for having the convent in the past. Unfortunately, she does not realize that these poor people don’t need to be cared for, but instead that they need help learning to stand on their own two feet and supporting themselves.
    As time goes on, the Cousin begins modernizing the estate and tilling the land. He periodically voices concern about Viridiana’s piety and generosity being a form of sickness or at least an evasion of what she need’s to do in order to move on with her life. Periodically the homeless people sheltered at the house make trouble for themselves and surroundings.
    At some point the Cousin buys an ‘overworked’ dog, the back and forth between him and the prior owner reveals that the dog was tied to the cart’s undercarriage for reasons twofold: one keeping the dog in the cool shade, and two keeping the dog from getting lost and run over. Further the prior dog owner gives care instructions on how to let the dog hunt for it’s own food, as well as to not overfeed the dog and untrain the rabbit hunting skills it has. This little scene seems to symbolize how one can go from working class to a sheltered invalid: being given too much without working for it makes one lame. This scene is then cut into a scene with the homeless people picking on the sick homeless person and his dead pet bird. The proximity of the scenes implies that the gilded cage will let you wither away and die, once your sponsor loses either capability or care enough to stop caring for you.
    In the last couple of scenes, the homeless people throw a party while the landowners are away. It goes quite overboard and one of the poor people rapes Viridiana. She loses the will to care for these people any longer and lets the police take them away. These crippled layabouts were thrown out by their ‘owner’ and were presumably unable to feed themselves without aid. So in the end, no one was saved by her attempts at making a shelter for the poor, as she only treated them like sheltered pets and not people with skillsets they needed to relearn how to use. But at least she was no longer out of touch with the ‘real world’ nor her family, so fin?
    -Tim Henderson

    ReplyDelete
  22. Don Luis Buñuel’s Viridiana provides a view on human desires. In interviews with Buñuel, it is mentioned that he did not seek to make a political message with his films. In reflecting on Viridiana there is not a distinct political message that is made with it. There are subtle looks at the Catholic Church, but there is nothing truly attacking the church’s views. Viridiana more looks at the basic desires that exist in humanity. In terms of the film and Francoist or Nationalist Spain, this theme was frowned upon. The film took the ideals that Nationalist Spain held in high regard and tarnished them. The Catholic Church and its followers were not seen in a positive light. There were certainly enough sexual inferences throughout the film to set the censorship of Nationalist Spain off. I think this is truly the only other connection that could be made from Buñuel’s film to Spain. It is important to take notice that Viridiana was found offensive for just showing the human condition.
    Viridiana follows a young woman, following the name of the title, who wants to become a nun. Circumstances unfold in the film that keep Viridiana from becoming a nun. Instead, Viridiana is seen losing her innocence a various times during the film. Viridiana is in two near rape scenes. Initially, she has a great hope for humanity. Then the paupers return her kindness by acting out and trashing her uncle’s estate. Buñuel shows a message that speaks to humanity having a darker side. No matter how good on the outside one may seem, that individual will eventually go back to their more basic instincts. In the case of the characters in Viridiana, all of them must come into terms with their lust in some form. This message comes out the clearest to over any religious or political tones.
    The offense that the film causes towards the sensitivities of Nationalist Spain is a possible political connection. Viridiana was released in Spain. Censorship officials would see and want to reject it. Reject it for how Viridiana no longer has the desires to be a nun and gives herself over to her lustful passions. Reject it for showing the followers the Catholic Church as less than perfect. Buñuel’s film stands as a protest for his material to be censored. The film displays humanity dealing with their interactions with lust. I believe the film achieves the goal of allowing for Buñuel being able to create a film that allows him to thwart censorship rules.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The film “Viridiana” by Luis Bunuel’s, although not intended, has a lot of political and religious undertones that are presented throughout the movie. Luis Bunuel was one that did not believe in authority and more so on the authority of the church that Spain was built on. I think he has a lot to say about communism in this film. When Viridiana brings home the paupers and gives them shelter they don’t really work for it at all and they still get food and a place to sleep. It later shows the paupers in prayer at noon with Viridiana and the workers that her cousin Jorge hired working simultaneously. I feel like this is representation of how communism does not work. In the simplest form communism is basically when everyone works and all the money they earn is collected then redistributed evenly. Going back to Viridiana, the paupers were still getting compensation for doing basically nothing and the workers who were doing actually work were getting basically the same compensation. Since Bunuel is not for communism it makes perfect sense why this would be portrayed in his film. When it comes to the religious aspects of the movie, I feel like he has a lot to say about where he stands. When Viridiana tries helping the paupers and she leaves them alone when her and her cousin have to go out of town, they take advantage of the lack of authority and essentially do whatever they want. This shows disobedience to authority and lack of integrity. The disobedience to authority is Bunuel’s way of showing how he was against authority. This scene where the pauper’s take advantage of Viridiana’s good merit shows that religion and charity, which goes hand in hand with religion, are just band aid’s they do not really do anything to fix the root of the problem. Basically saying that the cuts of Spain and the struggles are too deep for a band aid solution. Another thing that struck me as interesting was when Viridiana is at her uncles, for what is intended to be her last night there, he asks her to put on his late wife’s wedding dress then he asks her to marry him. When she refuses to do so he has his servant sedate her and he intended on taking advantage of her but he only ends up kissing her, from what we know. This scene brings the image of the virgin to mind and shows that even the purest things, or in this case people, can be tainted. In the documentary we watched about Luis Bunuel’s life, it mentioned that the sexual act, whether married or not, was deemed a sin because it could cause mental lust. When Viridiana finds out that her uncle may or may not have rapped her she feels impure and unholy that is why she decides not to go back to the convent. So no matter how good God may be, people are still sinful. Another thing mentioned in his documentary is how Bunuel felt like women should stay at home and be wives and mother’s. I feel like this is shown in this film when Viridiana has to go back to her uncles and take care of the house like women should, according to Bunuel’s beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Marcos Willman
    Viridiana, by Don Luis Bunuel was an excellent film where many ideas of politics and religion can be applied in context of Spain at that time. Viridiana plays an innocent woman who is planning on taking her vows to become a nun, until she receives word from her uncle who has funded her education and is ordered to visit him by her Mother Superior. After a series of events she refuses to marry her Uncle which leads to his suicide. After that she decides to stay in her Uncle’s large home and to use it as a homeless shelter for a group of homeless folk. I like the idea that was passed around in class that the homeless became in a sense pets for her, where she was trying to give them a good home with good food to help them, they still acted as though they had no discipline when they were left alone. From her eyes she was doing a great deed that made her feel better about herself, but in reality there were thousands more homeless and this little deed on a greater scale would certainly not help anyone. After they trashed the house and left while they could was a good example that what she had worked hard for was in a sense for nothing, leaving her defeated. I feel as though there is much depth in the symbology of this story in a political as well as a religious context. For example Jaime, Viridiana’s cousin from the start believes it is a bad idea to help out the homeless and tells her that helping this few will not make a difference, since there are so many more. Maybe with a regime that truly only helps so little of its’ population, it does not see a point in helping those below a certain economic class which make up so much more of the country.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Ivan Chinchilla
    Viridiana
    La película Verdiana por el director Luis Buñuel es una historia de transformación después de una tragedia. Por medio de la protagonista Verdiana, la película explora la condición emocional, spiritual, e intelectual después de una tragedia como la muerte de una persona en la familia después de un abuso de confianza. El director Buñuel dice que sus películas no contienen criticas políticas ni religiosas sino son representaciones del papel que la tradición e historia de una gente afecta su presente. Por eso creo que se confunden cuando analizan temas políticas porque aunque se puede interpretar así, es algo mas complicado que eso.
    El mejor ejemplo de esto se puede ver en la interpretación sobre el comentario de Jorge sobre los anos que su padre no trabajo en la tierra. Un comentario que fue interpretado como una referencia política a el estado de España durante la dictadura de Franco. Una interpretación valida pero por el propósito de esta análisis, voy a explorar este comentario como si no era relacionado a la política sino la cultura. Por cultura me refiero a los acciones de los antecedentes de la gente española durante la dictadura de Franco. Los tiempos de Franco y la cultura y costumbres sociales era como eran porque los antecedentes de la gente Española. Por ejemplo, la necesidad de reparar la casa y empezar a sembrar la tierra se puede referir a la condición de España después de la perdida de su imperio. Quizás Jorge quiere empezar a producir y hacer nuevo porque eso es como empiezas a recuperar.
    Entonces tenemos un director que dijo en su documental que representa las cosas como los ve y aunque no es directamente relacionado con el estado político del país, la política histórica si toma un papel en el desarrollo de la cultura para futura generaciones. Sin embargo, no podemos interpretar algo no esta allí para analizar en esa forma. En otras palabras, cuando analizando las películas de Luis Buñuel tenemos que empezar con ciertas preguntas del perspectivo histórico, cultural, o intelectual.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ivan Chinchilla
    Viridiana
    La película Verdiana por el director Luis Buñuel es una historia de transformación después de una tragedia. Por medio de la protagonista Verdiana, la película explora la condición emocional, spiritual, e intelectual después de una tragedia como la muerte de una persona en la familia después de un abuso de confianza. El director Buñuel dice que sus películas no contienen criticas políticas ni religiosas sino son representaciones del papel que la tradición e historia de una gente afecta su presente. Por eso creo que se confunden cuando analizan temas políticas porque aunque se puede interpretar así, es algo mas complicado que eso.
    El mejor ejemplo de esto se puede ver en la interpretación sobre el comentario de Jorge sobre los anos que su padre no trabajo en la tierra. Un comentario que fue interpretado como una referencia política a el estado de España durante la dictadura de Franco. Una interpretación valida pero por el propósito de esta análisis, voy a explorar este comentario como si no era relacionado a la política sino la cultura. Por cultura me refiero a los acciones de los antecedentes de la gente española durante la dictadura de Franco. Los tiempos de Franco y la cultura y costumbres sociales era como eran porque los antecedentes de la gente Española. Por ejemplo, la necesidad de reparar la casa y empezar a sembrar la tierra se puede referir a la condición de España después de la perdida de su imperio. Quizás Jorge quiere empezar a producir y hacer nuevo porque eso es como empiezas a recuperar.
    Entonces tenemos un director que dijo en su documental que representa las cosas como los ve y aunque no es directamente relacionado con el estado político del país, la política histórica si toma un papel en el desarrollo de la cultura para futura generaciones. Sin embargo, no podemos interpretar algo no esta allí para analizar en esa forma. En otras palabras, cuando analizando las películas de Luis Buñuel tenemos que empezar con ciertas preguntas del perspectivo histórico, cultural, o intelectual.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Matthew Braun
    Luis Bunuel’s film, “Viridiana” is a movie split into two acts. The first act of the film centers on Viridiana, a soon to be nun, and her Uncle, Don Jaime. Don Jaime has been the one paying for his niece’s schooling, yet was never emotionally available to Viridiana. Before completing her covenants, Viridiana is sent for by her Uncle to visit in the country. Though refusing at first, the Mother Superior urges her to go, as these are his final days. Don Jaime is infatuated with Viridiana as she looks like his dead wife. He even has Viridiana dress up in her late aunt’s wedding dress and asks her to marry him. She refuses so he plans to drug and rape her, but cannot find himself to do it. Later when she wakes up, Don Jaime confesses to everything, but tells Viridiana that he did not physically assault her; he only assaulted, or offended, her in his mind. Though he begs for forgiveness, Viridiana does not give it to him. These are two people in which offense and forgiveness play deeply into. Neither seem well suited for life – he is a reclusive shut in that does not know how to handle his feelings of intimacy, while she is inexperienced at life and far too ascetically religious. Don Jaime eventually hangs himself from a tree as a sign of repentance, yet Viridiana feels no guilt. She feels if she were to have acted differently to her Uncle’s advances that he would not have died. So she finds herself responsible for his death, yet does not feel guilty about it either.
    The second act occurs after Don Jaime’s suicide. Viridiana has chosen to not return to the convent and instead gathers a group of street urchins to come live at her Uncle’s estate. She takes a shot at redemption through this act, attempting to provide the beggars with a small token of human kindness. This human kindness is exactly what she did not show to her Uncle who has passed away for it.

    ReplyDelete